Not a transcript. Day accounts are summaries of news
reporting, not a record of what anyone said. Trial in progress, no verdict.
Commonwealth v. Clancy, August 17, 2026
MondayreportedtransitionDay 14 of 17
The Commonwealth rests after its digital-forensics witness, the defendant's motion for a required finding of not guilty is denied, and the defense opens with family, a former colleague and an emergency physician.
Key points
- Motion for a required finding of not guilty was DENIED, the case goes to the jury on criminal responsibility.
- The Commonwealth signalled it will call rebuttal experts.
- Whiffin's Apple Health evidence CORROBORATES the case reference timeline: stairs 17:33-17:38, second unanswered call 18:09, last unlock ~17:13.
- Dr. Vulfovich went uncross-examined, but was barred from opining on whether the suicide attempt was genuine.
- Spinal fractures, hypothermia and cardiac arrest establish the severity of the fall independent of intent.
- The defendant's mother confirmed a December 2022 disclosure of thoughts of harming the children.
- The sister, a mandated reporter, did not file a report.
Witnesses (5)
Ian WhiffinCommonwealth10:45
Customer engagement manager, Cellebrite (digital forensics)
Direct: Sprague Cross: Reddington
- Apple Health data from the defendant's phone and watch.
- Last heart rate recorded at 17:23 on January 24: 57 bpm.
- Device recorded going up two flights of stairs between 17:33 and 17:38.
- Unanswered call from Patrick at 17:33; a second unanswered call at 18:09.
- Phone last unlocked around 17:13, when children's laxatives were searched and a text sent to Patrick.
- Google searches: January 18, ketamine for suicidal ideation; January 19, symptoms of postpartum psychosis and psychosis symptoms.
- On cross, Reddington established the phone or watch battery could die or the device be powered down, limiting what the absence of data proves.
Margaret HampDefense12:30
Labour and delivery nurse, Massachusetts General; former colleague
Direct: Reddington Cross: Sprague
- The defendant loved her nursing work and was emotionally invested in her patients' births.
- Described the defendant calling police for a wellness check on her infant daughter during a night shift.
- Recalled the defendant asking about the Andrea Yates case, crying, and asking how a mother could hurt her children.
Allison OzgaDefense12:45
Sister of the defendant; licensed social worker and mandated reporter
Direct: Reddington Cross: Sprague
- At Thanksgiving 2022 the defendant looked tired and appeared to be struggling.
- Had a gut feeling something was wrong and asked whether she was safe.
- By late December 2022 the defendant reported suicidal ideation every day for a month.
- At a birthday party roughly two weeks before the killings, she seemed to be going through the motions.
- On cross, acknowledged she did not file a report despite being a mandated reporter.
Paula MusgroveDefense13:45
Mother of the defendant
Direct: Reddington Cross: Sprague
- In October 2022 the defendant texted asking her to come and stay with her.
- The defendant reported frightening side effects from psychiatric medication and did not want to be alone.
- Confirmed the defendant disclosed thoughts of harming the children in December 2022.
- Testified she was not concerned for the children's safety because she was present.
- Recalled the defendant saying this was not her and that she had never been like this before.
- Did not recall telling investigators the defendant seemed improved after the McLean admission.
- The defendant feared the school would think her a bad mother.
Michael VulfovichDefense16:00
Emergency physician, Newton-Wellesley Hospital; defense expert
Direct: Reddington Cross: not cross-examined
- Reviewed the South Shore Hospital records following the events of January 24.
- On arrival the defendant was unresponsive and not speaking intelligibly.
- She had cuts, had taken prescription medication, and had gone from a second-storey window.
- Severe hypothermia on arrival.
- Multiple fractures in the cervical and thoracic spine.
- Went into cardiac arrest after transfer to Brigham and Women's, requiring two rounds of CPR.
- The injuries were consistent with self-injurious behaviour, but he could not determine intent.
- The judge repeatedly sustained Commonwealth objections preventing him opining on whether the suicide attempt was genuine.
Exhibits and evidence
- Apple Health data from phone and watch
- Google search history
- Journal entries and notes from the phone
- Text messages with family
- Medical records, South Shore and Brigham and Women's
Rulings and objections
- ~11:35Motion for a required finding of not guilty DENIED. Reddington argued the evidence showed a mental disease or defect and repeated attempts to reach care; Sprague noted the Commonwealth intends to call expert witnesses in rebuttal.
- 16:00Objections repeatedly sustained, barring Dr. Vulfovich from opining on the legitimacy of the suicide attempt.
Procedural
- 11:30Commonwealth rests following Whiffin's redirect; jury sent out.
- 12:15Jury returns; defense opens its case-in-chief.
- 13:00Lunch recess.
- -Jury excused for the day after Dr. Vulfovich.